![]() Please support my blog and YouTube channel efforts via PayPal if you don’t want to try Patreon! All donations are very much appreciated and help with the running monthly costs. Weight wise, the lux is 50 grams heavier. Identical in size: the 50 cron and the 50 Lux V2. Their sizes are almost identical, yet the Summilux is the heavier lens with almost 300 grams. ![]() And the price is not the only thing that these two lenses have in common. 50mm summicron v3 plus#(Hopefully I can teach in the US again at some stage as I did in the past! – ) Need help with your Film Photography?Įxperiencing problems with your film camera(s) or struggling with your film developing? I can help you with that too! Set up a Zoom call with me via Patreon and I will assist! Join Patreon today for film photography support, plus all the other content mentioned above. So you can get a 50 Summilux V2 for roughly the same price as a brand new 50 Summicron. 50mm summicron v3 how to#For those of you in the US and further afield, I arrange Zoom call(s) and I will talk you through how to get started with photographing models in the city you live in. Photographers living in Europe, I can look to travel to your city once travel becomes easier again. For those of you in the UK, I organise model photography workshops in London. The Leica R6 camera lens setup is bigger and heavier than the Nikon with less camera functionality so that is worth noting too.īook a model photography workshop with me today and we can start to build your portfolio. We know that cost is usually not directly proportional to performance but the lens showed better flare resistance and higher contrast. The Leica R6 is the more expensive camera with the more expensive lens so in theory you would expect it to perform better (based purely on cost)(“Better” is subjective so I expect the results to give mixed comments from readers). Let me break it down into two conclusions – Leica R6 Performance – Conclusion Different lenses will transform the look of the final images even using the same camera body. ![]() The lens is what makes the image (+ the film) not the camera, but you need a camera that lets you focus and meter accurately to complete the task. Both cameras and lenses can take very nice photos and either setup is capable of making both you and the model (in this instance) very happy. And good pun! Thank you for reading.I know I will state the obvious, but sometimes for us photography GAS sufferers I need to. Naturally, flat planes are not what normally are shot, well spotted. ![]() Whether that has to do with curvature of plane, or age, or design, I have no idea.Īnd I only tested 1 metre distances (that distance chosen because another lens I added to the original test, a Canon LMT 50/1,4), so infinity, etc., isn't tested. But in general, you are right: the Summilux resolves corners or sides a bit better. Since I have no way to accurately align the film plane with the subject matter the corners are a hard point about which to definitively argue. I currently have a Zeiss Planar f2, it’s a great lens but would love to. I like to use 50mm as a one lens do it all, but take lots of portraits, especially of my boys. I guess one likes to have the sharpest lenses for cutting edge photography. Leica Summicron 50mm v5 vs 50mm Summilux ASPH Hi guys, any recommendations on the above I am looking for a lens that sharp, contrasty and has a beautiful bokeh. ![]() I didn't find your compare to be very maladroit, BTW. I haven't been in too many situations where a shot depends upon corner to corner sharpness at f2.0. The summilux appears to have better corner sharpness at wide apertures, but probably not noticeable in every day use. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |